Workflows
This document defines specific workflows for different types of work in the SPaDE project collaboration.
Workflow Types
1. Strategic Planning Workflow
Purpose: Define high-level direction and priorities
Participants: Bertie (lead), Alan (support)
Process:
- Bertie identifies strategic need or opportunity
- Bertie provides high-level vision and direction
- Alan analyzes current state and identifies gaps
- Alan develops detailed strategic options with analysis
- Bertie reviews and selects preferred approach
- Alan documents strategic decision and implementation plan
- Bertie validates final plan
Deliverables:
- Strategic vision document
- Implementation roadmap
- Success criteria
- Resource requirements
2. Architecture Design Workflow
Purpose: Design system architecture and components
Participants: Bertie (validation), Alan (design)
Process:
- Bertie provides architectural principles and constraints
- Alan analyzes requirements and current architecture
- Alan develops multiple architectural options
- Alan documents trade-offs and implications
- Bertie reviews and provides direction
- Alan refines architecture based on feedback
- Bertie validates final architecture
- Alan documents architecture and implementation plan
Deliverables:
- Architecture specification
- Component design documents
- Interface definitions
- Implementation guidelines
3. Implementation Workflow
Purpose: Develop technical components and systems
Participants: Alan (implementation), Bertie (review)
Process:
- Alan creates detailed specifications
- Alan implements technical components
- Alan conducts technical testing and validation
- Alan documents implementation and test results
- Bertie reviews major milestones and provides feedback
- Alan refines implementation based on feedback
- Bertie validates final implementation
- Alan documents final implementation
Deliverables:
- Technical specifications
- Implementation code
- Test results
- Documentation
4. Documentation Workflow
Purpose: Create and maintain project documentation
Participants: Alan (creation), Bertie (review)
Process:
- Alan identifies documentation needs
- Alan creates comprehensive documentation
- Alan ensures consistency and completeness
- Bertie reviews for accuracy and alignment
- Alan refines documentation based on feedback
- Bertie validates final documentation
- Alan maintains documentation as project evolves
Deliverables:
- Technical documentation
- User guides
- API documentation
- Process documentation
5. Review and Validation Workflow
Purpose: Ensure quality and alignment with vision
Participants: Both Bertie and Alan
Process:
- Alan conducts technical review and testing
- Alan documents findings and recommendations
- Bertie conducts philosophical and strategic review
- Bertie validates alignment with vision
- Joint review session for major deliverables
- Alan addresses feedback and makes improvements
- Bertie validates final deliverables
- Alan documents review results and decisions
Deliverables:
- Review reports
- Validation results
- Improvement recommendations
- Final validation documentation
Workflow Standards
Documentation Requirements
- Clear Process: Each workflow has well-defined steps
- Role Clarity: Clear responsibilities for each participant
- Deliverable Definition: Specific outputs for each workflow
- Quality Criteria: Clear standards for acceptable deliverables
Communication Requirements
- Regular Updates: Progress reports at each major step
- Issue Escalation: Clear process for handling problems
- Feedback Integration: Systematic incorporation of feedback
- Decision Documentation: Clear record of all decisions
Quality Assurance
- Multiple Reviews: Technical, philosophical, and strategic validation
- Iterative Refinement: Continuous improvement based on feedback
- Alignment Checking: Regular validation of vision alignment
- Completeness Verification: Ensuring all requirements are met
Workflow Customization
Adaptation to Project Needs
- Flexibility: Workflows can be adapted based on project requirements
- Learning: Workflows evolve based on experience and feedback
- Efficiency: Streamlining workflows to improve effectiveness
- Scalability: Ensuring workflows work as project grows
Specialized Workflows
- Research Workflow: For exploring new concepts and approaches
- Integration Workflow: For combining different components
- Testing Workflow: For comprehensive validation and testing
- Deployment Workflow: For releasing and distributing components
Workflow Management
Tracking and Monitoring
- Progress Tracking: Monitor progress through workflow steps
- Issue Identification: Identify and address problems early
- Quality Monitoring: Ensure deliverables meet standards
- Efficiency Measurement: Track workflow effectiveness
Continuous Improvement
- Regular Assessment: Evaluate workflow effectiveness
- Feedback Integration: Incorporate lessons learned
- Process Refinement: Improve workflows based on experience
- Tool Enhancement: Develop better tools and systems
Success Criteria
Workflow Effectiveness
- Clear Process: Well-defined and understood workflows
- Efficient Execution: Smooth progression through workflow steps
- Quality Deliverables: High-quality outputs that meet requirements
- Continuous Improvement: Learning and refinement over time
Collaboration Effectiveness
- Clear Communication: Understanding between participants
- Role Clarity: Clear responsibilities and expectations
- Feedback Integration: Effective incorporation of feedback
- Alignment Maintenance: Consistent alignment with vision
These workflows will evolve based on our experience and the needs of the project.